Important Takeaways:
- The World Health Organization said Friday it has granted its first authorization for use of a vaccine against mpox in adults, calling it an important step toward fighting the disease in Africa.
- The approval of the vaccine made by Bavarian Nordic A/S means that donors like vaccines alliance Gavi and UNICEF can buy it. But supplies are limited because there’s only a single manufacturer.
- WHO also said it was creating an “access and allocation mechanism” to try to fairly distribute mpox tests, treatments and vaccines to the countries who need them most.
- WHO said that while it was not recommending the vaccine for those under 18, the shot may be used in infants, children and adolescents “in outbreak settings where the benefits of vaccination outweigh the potential risks.”
- The mpox vaccine made by Bavarian Nordic was previously authorized by numerous rich countries across Europe and North America during the global mpox outbreak in 2022. Millions of doses given to adults showed the vaccine helped slow the virus’ spread, but there is limited evidence of how it works in children.
- Officials at the Africa Center for Disease Control and Prevention said last month that nearly 70% of cases in Congo — the country hardest hit by mpox — are in children younger than 15, who also accounted for 85% of deaths.
- Overall, WHO said over 120 countries have confirmed more than 103,000 cases of mpox since the outbreak began two years ago. Its latest tally, as of Sunday, showed that 723 people in more than a dozen countries in Africa have died of the disease.
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- “In this case, a person was infected during a stay in the part of Africa where there is a major outbreak of (the more infectious mpox formerly known as monkeypox),” the Public Health Agency of Sweden announced on Thursday.
- Magnus Gisslen, a state epidemiologist with the Swedish health agency, said the person had been treated and given “rules of conduct.”
- The U.N. health agency said there have been more than 14,000 cases and 524 deaths this year, which already exceed last year’s figures.
- So far, more than 96% of all cases and deaths are in Congo.
- Earlier this year, scientists identified a highly contagious form of mpox, which can kill up to 10% of people.
- Scientists in Europe have maintained that although mpox is transmittable and highly contagious, advanced health care in Sweden and other rich countries can stop the transmission before it becomes an epidemic.
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- The World Health Organization declared Wednesday that the increasing spread of mpox in Africa is a global health emergency, warning the virus might ultimately spill across international borders.
- WHO said there have been more than 14,000 cases and 524 deaths in Africa this year, which already exceed last year’s figures.
- WHO’s emergency declaration is meant to spur donor agencies and countries into action. But the global response to previous declarations has been mixed.
- Earlier this year, scientists reported the emergence of a new form of mpox in a Congolese mining town that can kill up to 10% of people and may spread more easily.
- Like any infectious disease, the new form of mpox seen in Congo could cross borders — cases have already been identified in four other East African countries.
- Unlike COVID-19 or measles, mpox is not airborne and typically requires close, skin-to-skin contact to spread.
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- The World Health Organization’s (W.H.O.) drive to seal a global pandemic treaty will conclude Friday after weeks of closed-door talks in Geneva, Switzerland.
- Critics have already accused the organization of bureaucratic overreach in pushing to seize control of how the world responds to any future pandemic along the lines of the coronavirus outbreak.
- The main disputes revolve around issues of access and equity: access to pathogens detected within countries, and access to pandemic-fighting products such as vaccines derived from that knowledge.
- Other tricky topics are sustainable financing, pathogen surveillance, supply chains, and the equitable distribution of not only tests, treatments and jabs, but also the means to produce them.
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- SOS: Stop the World Health Organization’s Tyrannical May 27 Power Grab
- The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations give the WHO Director General the authority to declare not just an actual but a potential international public health emergency and set out binding recommendations on how to address it, whether individual states agree with him or not.
- Worse, no criticism of the new WHO regime and its decisions to declare potential or actual pandemics, lockdowns and treatment, including vaccines, will be allowed under the amended IHR… In other words, the government lies, obfuscations and cover-ups that so dominated the last pandemic will become normalized, and all criticism outlawed.
- Already, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus (not a medical doctor) has castigated critics of the planned amendments and new Pandemic Treaty as conspiracy theorists who spread “fake news, lies and conspiracy theories.”
- Since the UN claims that to “owns the science,” it is now brainwashing the public into believing that “climate change” threatens global health. This view makes it likely that you will one day find yourself in a WHO-mandated lockdown to mitigate the effects of the “climate crisis,” along with limits on where you go, how you may get there, what you do, and what you can own.
- The US is already seeing forerunners of this in the Biden administration’s unconstitutional executive orders, possibly including his attempts to ban internal combustion engine vehicles and gas stoves; mandating dishwashing machines that may need repeated cycles to clean dishes, and new stricter regulations on air conditioners, washing machines, refrigerators, and even leaf-blowers — and this is only the beginning.
- The WHO is not elected, has no democratic legitimacy, is not accountable to anyone and has no control mechanisms to restrain its reach. After the horrifying failures of the WHO during Covid-19, the answer is not to give the organization more power, but to disengage from it entirely.
- The UN and the WHO evidently want unlimited control. If they are not stopped right now by national governments that refuse to approve the new Pandemic Treaty and proposed International Health Regulations amendments, unlimited control is what they will have — and it is we who will have given it to them.
Read the original article by clicking here.
“When once a Republic is corrupted, there is no possibility of remedying any of the growing evils but by removing the corruption and restoring its lost principles; every other correction is either useless or a new evil.” ~ Thomas Jefferson
Important Takeaways:
- As a practicing physician, I have had numerous conversations over the years with people caught in dysfunctional relationships. While it is often best to refrain from “telling” such persons the “right” course of action, one notable exception is when the relationship is clearly abusive.
- The cure to an abusive relationship is straightforward, if sometimes difficult: leave.
- The World Health Organization’s (WHO) relationship with member nations, including the United States, is a classic example of an abusive relationship.
- According to the US Health and Human Services’ Office on Women’s Health, an abusive relationship is characterized by a partner who:
- Controls what you’re doing.
- Checks your phone, email, or social networks without your permission.
- Decides what you wear or eat or how you spend money.
- Prevents or discourages you from going to work or school or seeing your family or friends.
- Humiliates you on purpose in front of others.
- Threatens to report you to the authorities for imagined crimes.
- Sound familiar?
- If not, please take the time to do the following.
- First, recall what the entire world was subjected to, starting around the Ides of March 2020:
- Gross civil rights offenses creating intense personal isolation and financial distress (lockdowns).
- Advanced psychological manipulation techniques creating fear, uncertainty, and dependency (“social distancing,” forced masking, “distance learning,” and endless “fear porn”).
- Egregious, population-wide violations of medical ethics amounting to industrial-scale physical assault (coercion and mandates to make millions accept repeated doses of the experimental Covid vaccines).
- Even in their “revised” form, the WHO seeks carte blanche to repeat the whole process, entirely at their own discretion.
- Let’s put it another way. Imagine that you and I are partners of some kind: domestic partners, business partners, whatever. I attempt to impose a complex legal agreement upon you. This agreement empowers me to control your freedom, money, and even your bodily autonomy, in the event that a hypothetical emergency occurs (which, by the way, I can declare at any time). You read the document and say, “That’s crazy!” So I water it down a little, in highly deceptive ways, throw the new version back at you, and give you no additional time to review it.
- What would you do in that scenario?
- The inimitable Ivor Cummins has dubbed the WHO’s pandemic power grab proposals as the “flu d’état.” This brilliant pun/neologism describes the WHO’s intent perfectly and succinctly: it means to use the threat of disease to illegitimately seize governmental power.
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- One Month Until WHO Pandemic Agreement Usurps U.S. Sovereignty, Experts Warn
- The global governance body will resume meetings to revise the WHO Pandemic Agreement on Monday. The Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), established to draw up the text of the agreement in December 2021, will hold its ninth meeting from April 29 to May 10. That provides just over two weeks before the 77th World Health Assembly meets from May 27 to June 1 in Geneva, Switzerland, to ratify the final document.
- The most recently updated version of the “Proposal for the WHO Pandemic Agreement,” amended on April 22, would redistribute wealth and protective equipment away from the U.S., establish a global governing board with little accountability to U.S. citizens and, critics say, water down U.S. sovereignty over how it responds to future pandemics.
- The latest version of the agreement calls on nations to adopt “whole-of-government and whole-of-society approaches” to pandemics, “including the private sector and civil society.” Governments should carry out so-called education programs that will suppress competing narratives about the pandemic, as the U.S. government did during COVID-19. Nations must also conduct research to determine what forces “hinder or strengthen adherence to public health and social measures in a pandemic,” such as mask and vaccine mandates.
- The text makes the WHO pandemic arrangement easy to get into but hard to leave. Once a nation signs onto the accord, it “shall not be discharged” from any “obligations which accrued while it was a Party to the WHO Pandemic Agreement,” even after it withdraws.
- The controversial document mandates that all nations assure “real-time access by WHO to 20%” of all “products that are needed for pandemic prevention, preparedness and response”: “10% as a donation” and 10% at “affordable prices.: WHO, in turn, will create “a mechanism to ensure the fair and equitable allocation and distribution of the
- pandemic-related health products” globally. Nations will agree to “prioritize sharing through” the WHO’s newly-established “Global Supply Chain and Logistics Network … over bilateral donation agreements” adopted with allied nations.
- Every nation “shall” also create a “global health emergency workforce deployable to support [other signatories] upon request” of WHO.
- Family Research Council has concluded that the WHO Pandemic Agreement puts in place the beginnings of “a turnkey totalitarian state.”
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- Around 73 million induced abortions take place worldwide each year. Six out of 10 (61%) of all unintended pregnancies, and 3 out of 10 (29%) of all pregnancies, end in induced abortion (1).
- Comprehensive abortion care is included in the list of essential health care services published by WHO in 2020. Abortion is a simple health care intervention that can be effectively managed by a wide range of health workers using medication or a surgical procedure.
- [Do some simple math: what’s the number in ten years’ time? 730 million abortions. What’s the number in 20 years’ time? 1.5 billion Abortions. What would history say about us? World War II was the deadliest military conflict in history. An estimated total of 70–85 million people perished, or about 3% of the 2.3 billion people that comprised the global population in 1940.]
Read the original article by clicking here.
Important Takeaways:
- Why is the WEF And everyone else suddenly talking about “Disease X”?
- Should all of this talk about “Disease X” alarm us? According to the WHO, “Disease X” is an “unknown” hypothetical disease that could potentially kill millions upon millions of people.
- …experts have speculated that it could cause 20 times more deaths than COVID did…
- Health leaders are meeting at the World Economic Forum (WEF) in Davos on Wednesday to discuss ways to prepare for ‘Disease X’ – a term coined by the World Health Organization (WHO) in 2018 to describe the unknown, hypothetical pathogen that could cause the next pandemic.
- According to some experts, Disease X could result in 20 times more fatalities than the coronavirus pandemic.
- It’s on the WHO’s shortlist of priority diseases, alongside viruses like SARS, Ebola and Zika.
- The WEF is certainly contributing to the hype around this hypothetical disease. On Wednesday, there will be an entire session at the WEF’s yearly gathering that has been entitled “Preparing for Disease X”…
- The list of speakers that are scheduled for this session includes the Director-General of the WHO…
- Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, Director-General, WHO
- Shyam Bishen, Head, Centre for Health and Healthcare; WEF Geneva
- Roy Jakobs, President and Chief Executive Officer, Royal Philips
- Preetha Reddy, Executive Vice-Chairperson, Apollo Hospitals Enterprise Ltd
- Nisia Trindade Lima, Minister of Health, Ministry of Health of Brazil
- Michel Demaré, Chair of the Board, AstraZeneca Plc
Read the original article by clicking here.
Daniel 7:23 “Thus he said: ‘As for the fourth beast, there shall be a fourth kingdom on earth, which shall be different from all the kingdoms, and it shall devour the whole earth, and trample it down, and break it to pieces.
Important Takeaways:
- WHO Seeks Power Over Humanity by Declaring ‘Climate Change’ Pandemic
- The World Health Organization (WHO) is negotiating a new pandemic treaty that could also give it powers to manage policies on climate change. This would give the WHO, and Director-General Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus in particular, the unilateral power to declare global pandemics and craft the response. It has backing from the United States and European Union. According to fellow travelers at the World Economic Forum, under the accord, “member states have agreed that it should be legally binding for those who sign up, overcoming early reservations from the United States.”
- It also includes what’s known as “One Health.” As The Epoch Times reported, One Health is a “broadening of pandemic response to potentially include things like farming, poverty, and climate change, which could either cause or exacerbate outbreaks, or impair peoples’ health in other ways.” This refers to anything that affects the well-being of humans, and everything under that umbrella will be within the powers of the WHO, the globalist member states, and its so-called stakeholders.
Read the original article by clicking here.
