Taliban to be taken to ICJ for gender discrimination in a groundbreaking move

Meryl-Streep-and-Asila-Wardak Meryl Streep and Asila Wardak at a UN women’s rights event in New York this week. Photograph: Bianca Otero/Zuma Press Wire/Rex/Shutterstock

Matthew 24:12 And because lawlessness will be increased, the love of many will grow cold

Important Takeaways:

  • The move announced at the UN general assembly is the first time the ICJ, based in The Hague, has been used by one country to take another to court over gender discrimination.
  • The case is being brought under the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women, which was adopted by the general assembly in 1979 and brought into force in 1981.
  • Afghanistan, prior to the 2021 Taliban takeover of the country, ratified the convention in 2003.
  • In the first legal move of this type since the Taliban took over, it is expected that Afghanistan would have six months to provide a response before the ICJ would hold a hearing and probably propose provisional measures.
  • Advocates of the course argue that even if the Taliban refuse to acknowledge the court’s authority, an ICJ ruling would have a deterrent effect on other states seeking to normalize diplomatic relations with the Taliban.
  • Last month, the Taliban published a new set of vice and virtue laws that said women must not leave the house without being fully covered and could not sing or raise their voices in public.
  • The countries involved in the litigation say they are willing to negotiate with the Taliban in good faith to end gender discrimination, but will, if the necessary stages prove fruitless, seek a hearing at the ICJ.

Read the original article by clicking here.