Alan Dershowitz: Universities need principled advocates with a single standard rather than those that are pressured by extremist students, faculty, and administrators

University-Presidents-Cowards The three university presidents who disgraced themselves and their universities by their abysmal testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Education and the Workforce represent a far larger concern. Pictured L-R: Claudine Gay, President of Harvard University, Liz Magill, President of University of Pennsylvania, Professor Pamela Nadell of American University, and Sally Kornbluth, President of Massachusetts Institute of Technology, testify before the House Education and Workforce Committee on December 5, 2023 in Washington, DC, on the subject of antisemitism on college campuses. (Photo by Kevin Dietsch/Getty Images)

Zachariah 14:2 For I will gather all the nations against Jerusalem to battle, and the city shall be taken and the houses plundered and the women raped. Half of the city shall go out into exile, but the rest of the people shall not be cut off from the city.

Important Takeaways:

  • Woke Cowardice: Wrong University Presidents at the Wrong Time
  • As Ecclesiastes observed “to everything there is a season”. This seems to be the season for woke cowardice
  • [These administrators] are also insensitive to civil liberties and the rights of those with whom they disagree.
  • It creates divisiveness on campuses that makes Jewish students and faculty fearful for their safety when their university president seems unwilling to apply the same standard to those who advocate genocide against Jews as they surely would against anyone who advocated genocide against Blacks or the raping of women or the shooting of gay and transgender people.
  • What these universities need now are principled advocates of a single standard, rather than leaders who base their decisions on outside pressures and the need to pander to extremist students, faculty and administrators.
  • One thing is clear: [university presidents] should be selected on the basis of relevant, individual meritocratic criteria— not the cookie cutter criteria of the “diversity, equity and inclusion” bureaucracies.

Read the original article by clicking here.