President Biden speaks in the State Dining Room of the White House in Washington, D.C., on May 31. (Michael Reynolds/EPA/Bloomberg via Getty Images
Romans 1:28 And since they did not see fit to acknowledge God, God gave them up to a debased mind to do what ought not to be done.
Important Takeaways:
- “This case demonstrates the abuse of power by executive federal agencies in the rulemaking process,” Doughty said in his ruling. “The separation of powers and system of checks and balances exist in this country for a reason.”
- Doughty ruled that the changes were inadmissible because the term “gender discrimination” as used in the establishment of Title IX “only included discrimination against biological males and females at the time of enactment.”
- The ruling blocks implementation of the changes in Louisiana, Mississippi, Montana and Idaho.
- Title IX is a longstanding civil rights law prohibiting sex-based discrimination in schools and other education centers that receive federal funding.
- Under the administration’s new rules, sex discrimination would include discrimination based on gender identity as well as sexual orientation.
- Critics say that the change will allow locker rooms and bathrooms to be based on gender identity.
- Lawsuits against the Biden administration’s changes — similar to the Louisiana case — are underway in states across the country.
Read the original article by clicking here.
